Here's How to Install Flash on Portable Versions of Firefox and Chrome Without Admin Rights. On Portable Browsers Without Admin Rights. Portable browsers was Flash player plugin and due to. How To Install Flash Player Without Admin Rights by Martin Brinkmann on November 06, 2010 in Tutorials - Last Update: November 21, 2012 - 13 comments Lets say you are currently working on a computer where you have standard user rights.
A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. Community members shall conduct themselves with professionalism. Do not expressly advertise your product. More details on the may be found.
For IT career related questions, please visit Please check out our, which includes lists of subreddits, webpages, books, and other articles of interest that every sysadmin should read! Checkout the Users are encouraged to contribute to and grow our Wiki. So you want to be a sysadmin? Official IRC Channel - #reddit-sysadmin on Official Discord -.
Just figured this one out a little while ago. Normally, you can install Java onto a machine silently by passing command line parameters to the installer EXE as per Oracle's instructions here: I've been beating my head on the wall trying to figure out why this won't work in a GPO Startup Script for a while now and finally figured it out.
Certain versions of Java 8 have a bug where installation will fail if it is launched by the SYSTEM account (e.g. The account that GPO startup scripts run as).
This happens because the first thing the EXE does when it is launched is it tries to extract an MSI into the user's 'Appdata LocalLow' folder. For a regular user account this works fine and goes into the '%USERPROFILE% AppData LocalLow Sun Java ' folder. But when you run the installer under the SYSTEM account it tries to extract the MSI to the C: Windows syswow64 config, which fails with access denied for. So that means that ALL of the testing you do running your scripts to install Java under a normal user account work fine, and then when you go to deploy it via Group Policy it just quietly fails for no obvious reason. The workaround is to extract the MSI yourself manually.
Take a test machine, launch the Java EXE under a normal user account, and then go into the '%USERPROFILE% AppData LocalLow Sun Java' folder and grab the extracted MSI file out of there. Put THAT file on your fileserver and install it using whatever deployment tools you like. In my case since it's a small environment I just use a GPO Startup script and MSIEXEC.EXE e.g.: msiexec.exe /i ' companyfileserver software jre1.8.045.msi' /qn /L C: install.java8u45.log Once you've finally got that working, you can configure Java by pushing out 'deployment.config' and 'deployment.properties' to the appropriate places on the workstation via group policy per the instructions here: Long story short, 'deployment.config' file must be placed in the C: Windows Sun Java Deployment folder, and specifies the path to the 'deployment.properties' file.
Deployment.config: deployment.system.config=file:///C:/Windows/Sun/Java/Deployment/deployment.properties deployment.system.config.mandatory=true The 'deployment.properties' specifies the actual settings you want to enforce in Java and should be placed wherever you specified it to exist in the 'deployment.config' file. Deployment.properties: deployment.security.level=HIGH deployment.expiration.check.enabled=false deployment.javaws.shortcut=NEVER Finally, by following the instructions in you can configure most of the settings in Java that you need. Specifically, under '21.2.2 Certificate stores and policy files', you can specify the path to the various files that specify the trusted sites list, trusted signer certificate stores etc. Which you can obtain from the default location on your test machine.
This way you can pre-trust all the poorly made unsigned / untrusted applets that your users will be using so they don't get prompted with security warnings. Only THEN will you have a reasonably pre-configured installation of Java that works and installs silently. Until Java breaks everything in version 9 of course.
Bloody Java, why you have to be so complicated? It only took me about six months for one dev group to finally get around to signing their Java code to execute in the environment and the email with all the links with the necessary information on Oracle's site was passed around and ignored for years. You'll get a kick out of this: two weeks ago I couldn't upgrade or remove / repair Java 1.6 off this one server, Oracle's error info indicated it was a Windows Installer issue, so then I get the offline fixit downloaded from MS and attempted to run it, and that would fail. Ended up using an old method of regkey hunting CAFEFACs and just buried regkeys and nuked it off the system. Naturally, it wouldn't let me install 1.6.0101 after that, but at that point I didn't give a shit. I still adamantly promote Ninite. I currently just have it ran on a schedule using SCCM to various collections with various restrictions.
It even tosses a log if you ask it to. It works well and it is simple.
It might be a little cost prohibitive as it is per machine but considering I haven't manually updated anything it supports in a couple years. I think there is worthwhile ROI. I also provide various installs to my staff via SCCM software center so they can install anything Ninite supports without admin privileges. Should I run into a new version of Java that doesn't update but instead installs a new version I can either use Ninite and SCCM collections to uninstall or use Silent Uninstall or the Java Nuke Script.
It all ends up pretty clean. The Ninite on a schedule was really quick to get set up.
I have a required deployment that copies Ninite.exe to c: Ninite and then the scheduled updates are just required deployments that have the dependency of Ninite.exe being in the right place. Ninite.exe /updateonly /exclude java 'Java x64' /silent 'C: Ninite update-nojava.txt' /disableautoupdate /disableshortcuts /allusers /cachepath ' server ninite' Java is excluded because we have a lot of 'java sensitive' inhouse stuff. You could probably combine it with Powershell App Deployment Toolkit and do some cool things as well. I really appreciate Ninite offering the /cachepath switch.
![Install flash player without admin privileges php code Install flash player without admin privileges php code](/uploads/1/2/5/6/125647099/354192115.jpg)
Every version of the software is downloaded once to the cache and from then on all clients grab it from the share. Ninite can be run at the command line, which means you can create a simple scheduled task to run something like: niniteone.exe /remote ad:OU=Workstations,OU=CompanyOU,DC=Company,DC=com /updateonly /disableshortcuts /disableautoupdate /silent report.csv Which updates all computers in a specific OU (there are other ways of passing a list of computers) with Ninite, disables creating a new shortcut on their desktop if they have deleted it, disables autoupdate, which disables any user prompts to update, does all this silently so the user doesn't even know it's happening, then spits out a report. Also, if you run into the 1603 error after uninstalling the conflicting Windows update KB2918614. I have ran into this with Ninite and the normal Java installer.
Java just needs to go away!. Close the installer when you see Java error 1603. (It has installed a bunch of files, but exits prematurely.). Open javacpl.exe from C: Program Files (x86) Java jre1.8.0XX bin (or for x64, C: Program Files Java jre1.8.0XX bin) where XX is the update number. Uncheck 'Enable Java content in the browser' on security tab and click OK to close Java control panel.
Retry installing Java. It usually succeeds for me this time. Open javacpl.exe again (see step #2). Check Enable Java content in browser on security tab and click OK to close Java control panel. Repeat for x86 or x64.
Hi, I am trying to include a flash (swf) file into a web resource. I copy the html code directly into the html editor (with the option pressed) but I get an error when the page is shown on the web. I suppose that for any security reason it is not allowed to include flash files directly in the content pages. I have seen this flash module. If I install it it will solve my problem?
Or it is for another thing. I donĀ“t need at this moment any registration of the behaviour of the student inside the flash, I just need to show the animation. If it is not with this module, how can I include a normal flash inside an HTML in a content resource?
Thank you for your help, Lorena. Hi Lorena, This can be done, but it's not a simple case of referring to the SWF file locally. I've tested this from an absolute and it works fine. Firstly, go into the Files window (Administration blockFiles) and then find the location of the SWF file you intend to use (in, right-click on the SWF file and select Properties) and copy the location. Then use this full location in the Flash embed code. Here's my example: There might be another way to do this which isn't absolute, but I'm sure this will do the job for now.
Hope this helps, Kris. In a wiki page I tried to add these lines: but it doesn't work. Any suggestion?
Thanks, Fair. Hi, A couple of things stand out. Here's the most severe: You have a location pointed in your embed tag but not in your object code. For all browsers you need the same info in both places.
Like this: If you are testing in Firefox, I'd wager that the movie would appear. Otherwise in it won't. Hi Angela, I did post a reply in the thread you created about this. (or was it for someone else?!?) When one can see the swf but the other can't, it is usually to do with the markup. Specifically, it is the and markup.
You (might) have your markup pointing to the swf in one location, whilst your markup is pointing to the swf somewhere else where it doesn't exist. IE uses and Firefox (and everything else) uses. I'd strongly recommend you check both are pointing to the correct location. If it was you I replied to elsewhere, then your IE markup was pointing to the swf in the same folder, whilst the swf was in a subfolder (correctly located in the firefox markup). I seems to have a problem opposite to yours. I have two swf buttons on my frontpage. They displays fine in IE but donnot show at all in the other browsers.
Has anybody experience this too or better still any solution. Below is the swf code.